In my last
post, I examined the polarizing social figure that Jesus was in his world and
in ours. Today, on the day after Easter, I will ponder the polarizing effect
Jesus had (and still has) on religion.
Jesus
entered Jerusalem on Palm Sunday to the cheering of the masses. Rather than
indulge in their adoration, Jesus’ first destination was the temple, the center
of religious life in first-century Judea. There the priests offered the blood
of bulls and goats to meet the requirements of the law, and there the people
came to bring offerings of thanksgiving for God’s blessings.
Jesus would
have visited the temple many times in his life, and only he out of all the
people who did so truly understood the significance of what went on there.
Perhaps that is why he was driven to confrontation when he saw the temple being
desecrated by money changers and the noise of animals. But take note that the
temple was not being desecrated by those outside the faith; it was being
dishonored by the leaders of the very faith the temple represented. The leaders
of the temple were using the house of worship and prayer to conduct business. They
were profiting financially from the system, and they were doing it at the
expense of the people. (How else can you interpret Jesus’ reference to a “den
of robbers”?) And because they were doing it directly in the temple courts, the
noise of the animals and the financial transactions was distracting those who
came to truly worship. Jesus responded with a whip and angry words until the
temple was cleansed. So much for Jesus being a soft-spoken pansy. This guy did
not hesitate to do what needed to be done, even if it meant making a scene. And
yet through it all he did not sin or lose control.
Jesus
reacted differently than anyone else when he walked into the temple. I
sometimes wonder how Jesus would respond if he walked into some of our churches
today. I think he would be much
different than we expect. Some of the things some churches care the most about
would not really concern him, and the things closest to his heart may seem
strange to many sitting in the pews. Would Jesus really care about what style
of music is played in the church service, or would he care more about making
sure each heart in the pew was touched by the finger of God? Would Jesus spend
time debating a proper interpretation of a certain line of Scripture or the
nuances of a segment of theology, or would he focus more on the needs of the
hurting people both in the pews and outside the church walls? Would Jesus spend
time arguing about what type of carpet to put in the new addition, or would he
focus the church’s budget on the mission field and assisting the needy in the
local community?
Many people
today like to think that Jesus was against religion. “It’s not religion; it’s a
relationship.” While that does have an element of truth to it, the statement is
not entirely accurate. Jesus was not anti-religion. He himself said he did not
come to abolish the law and the prophets but to fulfill them. In a way, Jesus
is the Ultimate Religion, the culmination of thousands of years of religious
tradition. So Jesus’ temple rant with a whip is not a condemnation of religion
in general. It was a condemnation of a religious establishment that had become
stagnant, entrenched, and worldly. There is much value in religion. It can help
discern truth (creed), guide to morality (code), and provide a structure for
worship (cult). But religion must always be infused with the Spirit of God or
it becomes nothing more than a shackle.
Jesus
brought the Spirit of God into religion. Actually, he brought the Spirit of God
into every area of life. I mean, after all, he was God. But in the realm of
religion, too often we miss some of the impact of what it means to be infused
with God’s Spirit. Sometimes that involves cutting out things that should not
be there like the moneychangers in the temple; other times it involves putting
things in that are not there like reaching out to the Samaritans, lepers, and
prostitutes. May we always be mindful of treating religion—and all areas of
life—the way Jesus would treat it: love, service to others, and devotion to
God.
It's an interest comment that the first thing He is recorded doing after the triumphal entry is doing battle with the greed in the temple (people HAD to offer sacrifices, so no price was too high)...
ReplyDeleteThe first act of God entering as a conqueror is to cleanse the self-interest and heartlessness. The week progresses, and many teachings, miracles, and signs occur, all highly significant. Before the Greatest Act of Sacrifice the attitude, nature, and full devotion of a servant is evidenced in the washing of the disciples' feet. Then, and only then, was it possible that the flesh was crucified and dead, and the new order of God's Kingdom established.
Christ demonstrated in the microcosm of one week the transformational process by which God works. We live out the length of our days, and are never done with the first step.